At times of national fiscal crisis, President Franklin Roosevelt ever so firmly believed, you dont give the awesomely affluent a free pass. You pound them and then you pound them some more. Against a Congress where zealously rich people-friendly conservatives hold the upper hand, how much can a President of the United States committed to greater equality realistically hope to accomplish?
The answer from todays White House: not much. Advocacy for equality has to take a backseat, Obama administration insiders insist, once fanatical friends of the fortunate in Congress recklessly put at risk our nations full faith and credit.
But history offers another alternative. Back in 1943, halfway through World War II, a President of the United States confronted a debt ceiling crisis eerily similar to our own. That President, Franklin Roosevelt, faced a congressional opposition to inconveniencing the rich with higher taxes every bit as rabid as ours.
FDRs choice, in the face of this opposition? He doubled down on equality.
Roosevelts debt ceiling battle actually began in the months right after Pearl Harbor. The nation needed dollars and lots of them to wage and win the new war. FDR wanted those dollars raised as equitably as possible.
That would require, FDR and his New Dealers believed, a steeply graduated income tax, with tax rates on income in the top income brackets much higher than rates on income in the bottom brackets.
How high should the top rates go? All the way, FDR proposed, to 100%. At a time of grave national danger, the President told Congress in April 1942, no American citizen ought to have a net income, after he has paid his taxes, of more than $25,000 a year, an income just shy of $350,000 in todays dollars.
The year before, gun executive Carl Swebilius had pulled in $243,204 after taxes, the equivalent of over $3.7 million today. Steel exec Eugene Grace had grabbed $522,537, over $8 million today, in 1941 salary. But conservatives in Congress looked the other way. They never gave FDRs plan any love.
FDR would not back down. In early October, the President flexed his authority under the newly enacted Emergency Price Control Act and issued an executive order that limited top corporate salaries to $25,000 after taxes, a move, he pronounced, needed to correct gross inequities and to provide for greater equality in contributing to the war effort.
Americas wealthiest, New Dealers explained afterwards to the press, should be willing to get along on more than $2,000 a month while marines endure tortures on Guadalcanal Island for $60 a month and room and board.
In Congress, meanwhile, lawmakers vowed to kill FDRs executive order by any legislative means necessary. Roosevelt, in response, simply kept pushing. In January 1943, he reminded Congress that the receipt of very large net incomes from any source constitutes a gross inequity undermining national unity and asked lawmakers to make taxes on Americas highest incomes fully effective.
Roosevelt also asked Congress, in his 1943 budget message, to raise the nations debt ceiling. Conservatives indicated they would if the ceiling bill included a rider that repealed the Presidents $25,000 salary cap executive order.
Lawmakers would not go along with a debt ceiling hike, California Republican Bertrand Gearhart told reporters, until FDRs thoroughly un-American salary cap, fraught with such disaster to the Republic, is wiped from the books.
At this point, no realistic observer could have faulted FDR if he simply threw in the towel. The 1942 mid-term elections the previous November, after all, had significantly strengthened the congressional conservative camp, in large part because millions of New Deal voters soldiers overseas and workers who had migrated far from home for wartime factory work couldnt vote.
But FDR threw in nothing. To reporters and Congress, he reiterated his support for the $25,000 salary cap.
Of course, the President added, he would rescind his cap in an instant if Congress passed legislation that limited all individual after-tax income, not just salary, to $25,000.
The President, to be sure, had definitely lost the debt ceiling battle over his executive salary cap, as he no doubt knew he would. But sometimes a President can win by losing. FDR did not prevail on the salary cap. He did prevail in his far broader struggle to shape the wartime finance debate. Roosevelts relentless campaign to cap top incomes kept that debate focused on taxing the rich.
Conservatives didnt want to do that taxing. They wanted a national sales tax instead, as do many conservatives today. But FDRs aggressive advocacy for equity never let that regressive sales tax notion get traction.
The war revenue debate would be fought on Roosevelts terms not on whether to tax the rich, but on how much. And, in the end, that how much would turn out to be quite a great deal. By the wars end, Americas wealthy would be paying taxes on income over $200,000 at a 94% statutory rate.
Americans making over $250,000 in 1944 over $3.2 million today paid 69% of their total incomes in federal income tax, after exploiting every tax loophole they could find. In 2007, by contrast, Americas 400 highest earners paid just 18.1% of their total incomes, after loopholes, in federal tax.
None of the debt ceiling deals that House and Senate leaders advanced last week asked any of these top 400 or any other rich Americans to pay a penny more in taxes than they do now. In the 2011 debt ceiling struggle, inequality has clearly triumphed.
So what ought we learn, amid this triumph for greed, from FDRs debt ceiling battle? Maybe this: We really can have a more equal America. We just need to fight for it.
Labor journalist Sam Pizzigati edits Too Much, a weekly newsletter on excess and inequality available at Inequality.org.
From The Progressive Populist, September 1, 2011
News | Current Issue | Back Issues | Essays | Links
About the Progressive Populist | How to Subscribe | How to Contact Us