More than a year after a tsunami swamped the Fukushima-Daiichi nuclear power plants, the radiation peril continues reactor 4 is teetering on the edge of collapse, which would force the evacuation of one-third of Japans population. The meltdown at Fukushima parallels the meltdown of the US economy.
On March 11, 2011, Japan experienced a 9.0 earthquake. The six nuclear plants at Fukushima about 136 miles north of Tokyo survived the quake but were swamped by a 45-foot wave that overwhelmed the 19-foot seawalls.
This was a catastrophe but there was a robust containment system that minimized the spread of contamination. As part of the maintenance process, the 1,535 fuel rods in Fukushima reactor 4 had been removed and placed in a pool of water outside the containment system. The aftermath of the tsunami severely damaged the building. This April, Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) toured Fukushima and warned that another big earthquake could further damage unit 4, producing an even greater release of radiation than the initial accident.
In January at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, former Japanese Prime Minister Naoto Kan warned of the possibility of a nuclear disaster and said that a meltdown at unit 4 would force the evacuation of Tokyo and close half of Japan. (On April 15, The European Union Times reported that the Japanese government had engaged with in discussions with China and Russia about the migration of 40 million Japanese because of the extreme danger of life threatening radiation poisoning.)
The saga of Fukushima-Daiichi follows the famous arc of the failed project: unwarranted enthusiasm followed by unmitigated disaster and then random retribution (search for the guilty, punishment of the innocent, and promotion of the uninvolved).
After the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the Japanese were not enthusiastic about nuclear power. As chronicled by New Yorker writer Evan Osnos, the US decided to convince Japan to build a nuclear power plant. After a 20-year campaign, public attitude shifted and nuclear power was embraced as the fire of hope in the 21st century. Japan powered up Fukushima unit 1 on Oct. 10, 1970, and built 53 more reactors. An atomic cult assured citizens that nuclear power was safe. Enos observed, The myth of total safety went beyond public relations and degraded the [nuclear] industrys technical competence.
Beginning in 1980, President Reagan convinced Americans that we did not have to sacrifice in order to have a good life and we began to believe we could borrow our way to riches. Fukushima-Daiichi was a level 7 nuclear event the most serious since 1986s Chernobyl meltdown and potentially the most serious in history.
In 2007, the US economic bubble burst as prices plummeted and investors defaulted. On Sept. 15, 2008, the Lehman Brothers investment bank filed for bankruptcy, causing a global financial panic. On Sept. 18, the Bush Administration presented an outline of a bank bailout plan to Congressional leaders, but the damage had been done: the US economy had experienced a meltdown. The Japanese government consistently understated the gravity of the situation it took them four months to admit that a meltdown had occurred in Fukushima reactors 1,2, and 3. Prime Minister Kan was replaced but his successor, Yoshihiko Noda, restarted nuclear plants and 36 continue to be used. In December 2008, one month after the US Presidential election, the Bush administration admitted that America had been in a recession since December of 2007.
Mitt Romney claims that it is President Obamas fault that America is not working. Meanwhile the financial institutions that caused the meltdown have grown more powerful. Japans nuclear tragedy and Americas economic crisis follow the same tragic pattern: A naïve population was seduced by a cult and abandoned common sense. That resulted in a meltdown.
In the aftermath, a confused electorate didnt understand what had happened, accepted bad advice, and little changed. Paving the way for another meltdown.
Bob Burnett lives in Berkeley, Calif. Email email@example.com.
From The Progressive Populist, June 1, 2012
News | Current Issue | Back Issues | Essays | Links
About the Progressive Populist | How to Subscribe | How to Contact Us