Promote Fair Trade
President Clinton is again promoting the expansion of the North American
Free Trade Agreement to include more of Latin America. Before doing so,
it is essential that we expand the rules and framework of NAFTA to ensure
that ordinary citizens, family farmers and working people share in the benefits.
In its purest form, free trade can set off a race to the bottom in treatment
of working people, family farmers and small entrepreneurs. Those nations
most willing to exploit them gain a competitive advantage over societies
committed to fairness.
With no rules, international trade forces wage rates down toward developing
world levels. As family farmers and small business people are forced to
compete with corporate farms paying dirt-cheap wages, they find it increasingly
difficult to pay themselves a middle-class income for their own labors.
What can be done? We can't wall ourselves off from the rest of the world.
But we can establish a set of international trade rules that allow all to
share fairly in the benefits and that include clear and enforceable standards
for treatment of labor and protection of the environment. Those who want
access to our markets must not gain an advantage through exploitation of
people and the environment.
In addition to changing the rules, we must change our way of thinking. The
existence of desperately poor people anywhere in the world willing to work
at any wage drives income down everywhere for people who work with their
hands. In a global economy, we are all in it together. We must find ways
to improve opportunities for the poor in the developing world, or working
people and family businesses will suffer everywhere. -- Chuck Hassebrook,
from the Center for Rural Affairs Newsletter, July 1998.
Mid-term races tighten up
Prospects for changes in control of Congress this fall appear to be remote.
In the U.S. Senate, where Republicans have a 10-seat majority, about seven
Republican Senate seats are "in play," while eight Democratic
Senate seats are seen as "at risk," according to the smart money
in Washington. Democrats have the best chances to pick up seats in Indiana,
North Carolina and New York, where moderate Democrat Evan Bayh is expected
to win the seat Dan Coats is giving up and Lauch Faircloth and Alphonse
D'Amato are seen as vulnerable. Democrats also are expected to be competitive
in Colorado, Georgia, Indiana and Missouri. Democrats will have to scramble
to keep the seats Dale Bumpers is giving up in Arkansas and Wendell Ford
is giving up in Kentucky, and they'll have to fight to re-elect Barbara
Boxer in California, Carol Moseley-Braun in Illinois, Harry Reid in Nevada,
Fritz Hollings in South Carolina, Patty Murray in Washington and Russ Feingold
In the House, where the GOP has an 11-seat majority, Stuart Rothenberg,
the political handicapper of Roll Call magazine, does not see major
changes coming out of this election. Among the Republican incumbents targeted
by Democrats are Bill Redmond of New Mexico, Steve Chabot in Ohio, Vince
Snowbarger of Kansas, Jon Fox of Pennsylvania and John Hostetler. Democratic
incumbents on the run include Jim Maloney of Connecticut, Lane Evans of
Illinois, Charlie Stenholm of Texas, Jay Johnson of Wisconsin and Ted Strickland
of Ohio. Of 34 open House seats, 19 races (nine Democratic and 10 Republican)
are expected to be competitive, according to Roll Call. Four other
open seats are expected to switch columns, as Democrats are expected to
pick up three and Republicans are expected to pick up one.
House Denies Ballot Access, Presidential Debate Bills
Bills to make it easier for new parties and independent candidates to qualify
for ballots and expanding presidential debates to "minor" candidates
were handily defeated July 30 during floor action on the Shays-Meehan campaign
finance reform bill. The bills were offered by Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, as
amendments to the Shays-Meehan bill. The ballot access amendment, which
was defeated by a vote of 62-363, would have set a ceiling on the number
of signature that states could require as a condition for access to the
general election ballot for federal offices. The ceilings would be one-tenth
of 1 percent of the last vote cast for the office. The other amendment by
Paul, which was defeated 88-337, would have required presidential candidates
who receive general election public financing to agree to debate any opponent
who is on the ballot in at least 40 states.
VOTING CONFERENCES SET--The Center for Voting and Democracy is sponsoring
national conferences on proportional representation, fair elections and
empowering the voter in San Francisco September 12-13 and in Minneapolis
November 13-15. Topics include "PR and Campaign Finance Reform,"
"Representation of Women," "PR Around the World," "How
Do You Count Those Transferable Ballots Anyway?" "Hitler, Coalitions
and Complexity," "Foundations and Political Reform," and
others. For information contact Steve Hill, 415-665-5044; email firstname.lastname@example.org;
or see www.fairvote.org.
CORRECTION--Roger Hoffman, the author of "Family Farms are Worth
Saving" in the 8/98 Progressive Populist, is former executive
director of Idaho Rural Council.
News | Current Issue
| Back Issues | Essays
About the Progressive Populist | How
to Subscribe | How to Contact Us
Copyright © 1998 The Progressive Populist