Like many global meatpacking companies, JBS SA, the giant Brazilian meat and poultry packer with extensive operations in North and South America, Europe, and Australia, spent most of the last six months buying its way out of trouble with US customers and the American government.
Even a cursory examination shows JBS spent $221.5 million in February to settle allegations it helped rig US poultry prices and, last October, it paid $280 million “to settle charges it violated (US) anticorruption laws.”
Both those deals came after a JBS subsidiary paid the US “$27 million to settle charges it used illegally obtained money to finance the purchase of Pilgrim’s Pride,” the second largest US poultry company, in 2009.
Even more astonishing, the money river flowed both ways: JBS USA, the serial bad boy of global meatpacking, received $90 million in “trade mitigation commodity contracts” for pork purchased by the Trump Administration in its 2019-20 tariff fight with China.
Still, as noted last week, JBS wasn’t—isn’t—the only global meatpacker making an already dirty business even dirtier. Other packers are targets of ongoing market investigations while some, like Tyson Foods, have joined JBS in paying millions to settle civil suits.
In fact, given these settlements and an ongoing US Department of Justice investigation, Big Meat might just be the most collusive, most corrupt, and most unrepentant business sector in the US today.
Which begs two questions: Why do we, both its customers and lawmakers, tolerate so much confessed—and unconfessed—corruption in meatpacking? And what, if any, benefits do we receive in return for all this evident corporate lawlessness?
It can’t be great value, because Big Meat doesn’t provide great value.
Indeed, according to US Department of Agriculture (USDA) data, as meatpacker control on both the animal buying side and meat selling side grew since 2000, consumer prices have risen 82% in beef, 44% in pork, and 33% in poultry.
Moreover, it’s not like farmers and ranchers now receive better prices for their livestock and poultry. In fact, if calculated in current 2021 dollars, total “cash receipts” farmers pocketed for their sales have fallen since 2000.
For example, in today’s dollars, farmers received $76.4 billion for cattle and calves in 2000. (USDA doesn’t divide the two.) In 2021, they will pocket an estimated $66 billion, or $10 billion less.
Similarly, in today’s dollars, US farmers received $25.5 billion for their hogs in 2000. This year, the estimated market value will be more than $1 billion less, or $24.3 billion.
Also, two decades ago, broilers (frying chickens) brought farmers $28.7 billion; this year, they’ll bring 15 percent less, or $24.3 billion.
So, today, farmers are receiving less for their livestock and poultry, consumers are paying more their beef, pork and chicken and meatpackers—the highly integrated link between the two—are paying hundreds of millions in civil and criminal penalties to keep their admittedly-crooked system more than profitable to continue operations and expand their global reach.
And expand they are.
On Nov. 10, two months before it announced it will pay $221.5 million to settle “broiler chicken antitrust civil price fixing litigation,” Tyson Foods announced “plans to invest in new processing facilities and expand existing plants in Thailand, China and The Netherlands.”
In early April, JBS, the global poster child of meatpacker malfeasance, announced that it is prepared to spend part of its 2020 “record cash flow” to both “boost capital spending by as much as 48% this year” and “actively seek acquisitions.”
Meanwhile, according to recent reporting, US taxpayers sent cattle producers $7.17 billion under the Coronavirus Food Assistance Program Aid (CFAP), “$2 billion more than any other eligible livestock or crop,” while “(p)ork producers so far have received about $1.14 billion …”
Little wonder then why meatpackers like JBS can buy their way out of corruption charges one day and announce plans to expand their empires the next: they’re not using shareholder money to fund any of it.
They’re using yours.
Alan Guebert is an agricultural journalist who was raised on an Illinois dairy farm and worked as a writer and senior editor at Professional Farmers of America and Successful Farming magazine and is now a contributing editor to Farm Journal magazine. Guebert and his daughter Mary Grace Foxwell co-wrote “The Land of Milk and Uncle Honey: Memories from the Farm of My Youth” [University of Illinois Press, 2015]. See farmandfoodfile.com
From The Progressive Populist, May 1, 2021
Blog | Current Issue | Back Issues | Essays | Links
About the Progressive Populist | How to Subscribe | How to Contact Us
PO Box 819, Manchaca TX 78652